Shift in proprioceptive activity in recovery from post-stroke hemiparesis

Objective: Imaging studies of the motor system employing active motor tasks have been applied extensively in patients after ischemic stroke (1-3), but have not yielded reliable measures for predicting recovery. This might be in part due to the complexity and flexibility of the motor system to cope with lesions, in part to the variability of the lesion site causing motoric deficits. Little is known about the role of the proprioceptive system for recovery after stroke despite rehabilitation strategies utilize proprioceptive facilitation (4) and despite the role of proprioceptors for spasticity. This study was designed to investigate the activity of the proprioceptive system during early recovery after pure motor stroke. Methods: Ten patients with unilateral infarction of the posterior limb of the internal capsule were investigated using O-15-water PET during passive extension of the index finger of the paretic and non-paretic hands. PET scanning and assessment of motor recovery were performed early (mean 4.7 days) and after rehabilitation with 30 minutes of physiotherapy daily for an average of 17.6 days. Changes in brain activation patterns induced by passive finger movement were analyzed using SPM99. Results: All patients showed significant improvement of motor-function of the paretic limb after rehabilitation. During passive finger movement of the non-paretic index-finger, significant CBF-increases were observed in the SI (BA3) and SII (BA 40 and 39) areas of the non-infarcted hemisphere, as previously reported for normal subjects. Additionally, significant activation of ipsilateral SII in the infarcted hemisphere was observed. After rehabilitation ipsilateral SII activation vanished and the normal activation pattern was restored. During passive movement of the paretic index-finger opposite changes of activation patterns were observed. Initially only SI and SII of the infarcted hemisphere were activated, like in normal subjects. During rehabilitation additional recruitment of SII in the non-infarcted hemisphere occurred. Conclusion: Recovery from internal capsule infarction is accompanied by substantial changes in activity of proprioceptive systems not only of the paretic but also of the non-paretic limb. These changes are evident in ipsilateral activity of SII during the acute phase of stroke, which vanishes for stimulation of the non-paretic limb after recovery, but newly occurs after rehabilitation of the paretic limb. The consecutive alternating activations of SII are observed during non-complex, non-sequential passive movements. These changes in the activation patterns cannot be easily explained by plasticity of the proprioceptive system, since the time span is too short for adaptation. It might in part be due to a reduction of transcallosal inhibition of the affected onto the intact hemisphere; it may also reflect an interhemispheric shift of attention to proprioceptive stimuli associated with recovery.