Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare L-cone-driven, S-cone-driven, and rod-driven temporal contrast sensitivities (tCSs) in patients with Stargardt disease 1/fundus flavimaculatus (STGD1/FF). METHODS: Fourteen patients (eight male, six female; mean age, 43.21 ± 13.18 years) with genetically confirmed STGD1/FF participated in this study. A dedicated light-emitting diode stimulator was used to measure perifoveal tCSs in an annular test field (1°-6° of visual eccentricity) at temporal frequencies between 1 and 20 Hz. Photoreceptor classes were isolated with the triple silent substitution technique. To compare functional damage among photoreceptor classes, sensitivity deviations (decibels) were calculated based on age-related normal values and then averaged across those frequencies where perception is mediated by the same post-receptoral pathway (L-cone red-green opponent pathway: 1, 2, 4 Hz; luminance pathway: 12, 16, 20 Hz; S-cone pathway: 1, 2, 4 Hz; fast rod pathway: 8, 10, 12 Hz). Sensitivity deviations were compared with infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (IR-SLO) and standard automated perimetry (SAP). RESULTS: Photoreceptor-driven tCSs were generally lower in patients with STGD1/FF than in normal subjects but were without systematic differences among photoreceptors. Although sensitivity deviations were significantly correlated between each other, only luminance-driven L-cone sensitivity deviations were significantly correlated with the IR-SLO area of hyporeflectance (AoH) and SAP central mean deviation within 6° eccentricity (MD6deg). CONCLUSIONS: No systematic differences between photoreceptor classes were detected; however, our data suggest that temporal contrasts detected by the luminance pathway were closely correlated with other clinical parameters (AoH and MD6deg) and might be most useful as functional biomarkers in clinical trials.

Original publication

DOI

10.1167/iovs.62.14.24

Type

Journal article

Journal

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

Publication Date

01/11/2021

Volume

62

Keywords

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Adult, Contrast Sensitivity, Electroretinography, Female, Fovea Centralis, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ophthalmoscopy, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Rod Opsins, Stargardt Disease, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Visual Field Tests, Young Adult