Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Humans and monkeys can learn to classify perceptual information in a statistically optimal fashion if the functional groupings remain stable over many hundreds of trials, but little is known about categorization when the environment changes rapidly. Here, we used a combination of computational modeling and functional neuroimaging to understand how humans classify visual stimuli drawn from categories whose mean and variance jumped unpredictably. Models based on optimal learning (Bayesian model) and a cognitive strategy (working memory model) both explained unique variance in choice, reaction time, and brain activity. However, the working memory model was the best predictor of performance in volatile environments, whereas statistically optimal performance emerged in periods of relative stability. Bayesian and working memory models predicted decision-related activity in distinct regions of the prefrontal cortex and midbrain. These findings suggest that perceptual category judgments, like value-guided choices, may be guided by multiple controllers.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.022

Type

Journal article

Journal

Neuron

Publication Date

25/08/2011

Volume

71

Pages

725 - 736

Keywords

Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Computer Simulation, Environment, Haplorhini, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Perception, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Young Adult