Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.
Skip to main content

It is of increasing interest to study "brain age" - the apparent age of a subject, as inferred from brain imaging data. The difference between brain age and actual age (the "delta") is typically computed, reflecting deviation from the population norm. This therefore may reflect accelerated aging (positive delta) or resilience (negative delta) and has been found to be a useful correlate with factors such as disease and cognitive decline. However, although there has been a range of methods proposed for estimating brain age, there has been little study of the optimal ways of computing the delta. In this technical note we describe problems with the most common current approach, and present potential improvements. We evaluate different estimation methods on simulated and real data. We also find the strongest correlations of corrected brain age delta with 5792 non-imaging variables (non-brain physical measures, life-factor measures, cognitive test scores, etc.), and also with 2641 multimodal brain imaging-derived phenotypes, with data from 19,000 participants in UK Biobank.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.017

Type

Journal article

Journal

Neuroimage

Publication Date

12/06/2019

Keywords

Brain aging, Brain imaging, UK biobank