Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Disease-modifying treatments for major neurocognitive disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and other cognitive deficits, are among the main unmet needs in modern medicine. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), currently licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, offer a novel, multilayered mechanism for intervention in neurodegeneration through intermediate, aetiology-agnostic pathways, likely involving metabolic, inflammatory and several other relevant neurobiological processes. In vitro and animal studies have revealed promising signals of neuroprotection, with preliminary supportive evidence emerging from recent pharmacoepidemiological investigations and clinical trials. In this article, we comprehensively review studies that investigate the impact of GLP-1RAs on the various aetiologies of cognitive impairment and dementia syndromes. Focusing on evidence from human studies, we highlight how brain energy homeostasis, neurogenesis, synaptic functioning, neuroinflammation and other cellular stress responses, pathological protein aggregates, proteostasis, cerebrovascular system and blood-brain barrier dynamics may underlie GLP-1RA putative neuroprotective effects. We then report and appraise evidence from clinical studies, including observational investigations, clinical trials and pooled analyses. Finally, we discuss current challenges and perspectives ahead for research and clinical implementation of GLP-1RAs for the care of people with major neurocognitive disorders, including their individual brain penetrance potential, the need for response biomarkers and disease stage-based indications, their possible non-specific effects on brain health, their profile in terms of adverse events and other unwanted effects, the lack of long-term data for efficacy and safety, and issues surrounding cost and availability of treatment.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593

Type

Journal

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

Publication Date

10/04/2025

Keywords

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, DEMENTIA, PARKINSON'S DISEASE