Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare L-, M-, S-cone-, and rod-driven temporal contrast sensitivities (tCS) in patients with RP1L1-associated autosomal-dominant occult macular dystrophy (OMD), and to investigate how photoreceptor degeneration determines which post-receptoral channels dominate perception. METHODS: Photoreceptor isolating stimuli were created with the silent substitution technique. Photoreceptor-selective tCS deviations (D L-cone/M-cone/S-cone/Rod) were obtained as a function of temporal frequency with identical retinal adaptation, by subtracting tCS from age-corrected normal values. A linear-mixed effects model was used for analysis. RESULTS: Eleven genetically confirmed patients were included (7 women, 5 men; age = 52.27 ± 14.44 years). Overall, L- and M-cone-driven sensitivity deviations (DL-cone and DM-cone) were more negative than DS-cone; DRod was normal at frequencies between 8 and 12 Hz in all subjects. Rod-driven tCS functions allowed identification of two subgroups of patients: one with band-pass properties and one with low-pass properties, suggesting dominance of different post-receptoral filters. The same filtering properties were observed in L-cone-driven tCS functions. Furthermore, the two subgroups also differed in clinical parameters (spherical equivalent, BCVA, perimetry, and ocular coherence tomography (OCT) reflectivity of the ellipsoid zone relative to the RPE). CONCLUSIONS: OMD was characterized predominantly by deterioration of L- and M-cone-cone driven function in the perifovea. Rod-driven functions were normal. Differences in the photoreceptor signals were further modified by postreceptoral filters.

Original publication

DOI

10.1167/iovs.64.7.33

Type

Journal article

Journal

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

Publication Date

01/06/2023

Volume

64

Keywords

Male, Humans, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Aged, Electroretinography, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Macular Degeneration, Vision, Ocular, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Retinal Dystrophies, Eye Proteins